Important points to consider when evaluating the response to drug therapy for lung cancer

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Drug therapy for primary lung cancer, including molecular-targeted drugs and immune-check point inhibitors, has markedly progressed in the precision medicine era. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 have been used to determine the presence of progressive disease (PD); however, there are some drawbacks to performing such an evaluation based on the greatest diameter of the tumor alone. We herein review the limitations of the response evaluation using RECIST v1.1 and recent advances made in the early detection of the therapeutic effect and prediction of the prognosis using functional imaging modalities, such as fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT), dual-energy CT, perfusion CT, and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. In addition, we describe the atypical response patterns after immunotherapy using anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yabuuchi, H., Kamitani, T., Sagiyama, K., Yamasaki, Y., Hida, T., Matsuura, Y., & Ishigami, K. (2020, December 1). Important points to consider when evaluating the response to drug therapy for lung cancer. Japanese Journal of Lung Cancer. Japan Lung Cancer Society. https://doi.org/10.2482/HAIGAN.60.942

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free