Reliability of retrieval from semantic memory: Noun meanings

26Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose of this experiment was to determine how reliably college students could retrieve from memory semantic information about commonly used nouns. In two recall sessions separated by 1 week, subjects gave definitions for abstract nouns, category labels, and concrete nouns. It was found that more propositions were given in definitions of concrete nouns (7.13) than in definitions of category labels (6.73) or abstract nouns (4.13). The within-subject reliability of retrieval was.55 for concrete nouns,.46 for category labels, and.43 for abstract nouns. The between-subjects reliability was.29 for concrete nouns,.20 for category labels, and.17 for abstract nouns. Discussed are the implications of these data for the hypothesis that the single word represents the unit of meaning. © 1984, The psychonomic Society, Inc.. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bellezza, F. S. (1984). Reliability of retrieval from semantic memory: Noun meanings. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22(5), 377–380. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03333850

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free