Utility of Flow Cytometry and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization in Follow-up Monitoring of Plasma Cell Myeloma

5Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: We sought to investigate the clinical utility of flow cytometry (FC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the workup of myeloma. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the reports of bone marrow biopsies received for myeloma evaluation between October 2015 and January 2019. Results: A total of 1,708 biopsy specimens from 469 myeloma patients (mean age, 64.5 years [SD, 9.3]; female, 41.4%) were reviewed. Both FC and FISH had comparable detection rates at the time of initial diagnosis (97.6% vs 98.8%) and for follow-up cases (28.6% vs 28.2%). FC and FISH results were concordant in 98.8% of the initial diagnosis cases and 89.6% of the follow-up cases. The FISH-positive (FISH+)/FC-negative (FC-) discordance and FISH-/FC+ discordance occurred among 81 (5.0%) and 87 (5.4%) follow-up cases. In comparison with all concordant cases, FISH+/FC- discordant cases were more likely to have received treatment with daratumumab (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chopra, S., Dunham, T., Syrbu, S. I., Karandikar, N. J., Darbro, B. W., & Holman, C. J. (2021). Utility of Flow Cytometry and Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization in Follow-up Monitoring of Plasma Cell Myeloma. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 156(2), 198–204. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaa224

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free