Search and learn: On dead-end detectors, the traps they set, and trap learning

6Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A key technique for proving unsolvability in classical planning are dead-end detectors Δ: effectively testable criteria sufficient for unsolvability, pruning (some) unsolvable states during search. Related to this, a recent proposal is the identification of traps prior to search, compact representations of non-goal state sets T that cannot be escaped. Here, we create new synergy across these ideas. We define a generalized concept of traps, relative to a given dead-end detector Δ, where T can be escaped, but only into dead-end states detected by Δ. We show how to learn compact representations of such T during search, extending the reach of Δ. Our experiments show that this can be quite beneficial. It improves coverage for many unsolvable benchmark planning domains and dead-end detectors Δ, in particular on resource-constrained domains where it outperforms the state of the art.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Steinmetz, M., & Hoffmann, J. (2017). Search and learn: On dead-end detectors, the traps they set, and trap learning. In IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 0, pp. 4398–4404). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/614

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free