Brand Corporateness: Measurement and Symbolic Meaning of an Unfavorable Brand Association

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

This research establishes brand corporateness as a novel brand association that most consumers find unfavorable. Exploratory focus group findings first illuminate consumer meaning structures and attitudes around brand corporateness. An inductive grounded theory approach suggests three core (hierarchical, mechanistic, opaque) and three ancillary (ubiquitous, traditional, strategic) dimensions of the construct, informing a subsequent literature review that theoretically confirms this structure. Our theorizing also suggests that greater corporateness diminishes consumers’ self-brand connection because the symbolic meanings of its core dimensions clash with several fundamental human values, a negative effect that is heightened among more politically liberal consumers. The main empirical work then develops and validates a measure of brand corporateness across 11 studies using best practices in scale development. After a rigorous item generation and refinement process, our studies provide converging evidence for the scale’s structural, nomological, discriminant, predictive, and ecological validity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reich, B. J., & Hanson, S. (2025, October 1). Brand Corporateness: Measurement and Symbolic Meaning of an Unfavorable Brand Association. Journal of Consumer Research. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucae069

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free