Current understanding of bleeding with ibrutinib use: A systematic review and meta-analysis

88Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Ibrutinib therapy was associated with an increased risk of bleeding in previous trials. In this systematic review and meta-analysis of published trials including patients treated with ibrutinib, the relative risk (95% confidence interval [CI]) of overall bleeding was significantly higher in ibrutinib recipients (2.72 [1.62-6.58]), but major bleeding did not show a significant difference (1.66 [0.96-2.85]). The incidences (95% CI) of major bleeding and any bleeding were 3.0 (2.3-3.7) and 20.8 (19.1-22.1) per 100 patient-years, respectively. This analysis is limited by reporting bias from variable ascertainment of bleeding and lack of allocation concealment in some studies and differing exposures between groups, leading to potential overestimation of event rates in the ibrutinib group.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Caron, F., Leong, D. P., Hillis, C., Fraser, G., & Siegal, D. (2017). Current understanding of bleeding with ibrutinib use: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood Advances, 1(12), 772–778. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2016001883

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free