A comparison between micro- and nanocellulose-filled composite adhesives for oil paintings restoration

22Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) and microcrystals (CMC) were selected as reinforcing fillers for poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline), a water-soluble thermoplastic adhesive widely used in the restoration of oil paintings. Thin composite films containing 5, 10, and 30 wt% of CNC or CMC were produced by solution mixing and casting. UV-vis spectroscopy showed how CNC preserved the adhesive transparency even at the highest CNC content, while for CMC, a progressive loss of transparency was observed. Thermal analysis evidenced a progressive increase of the glass transition temperature of the polymer matrix induced by CNC, while no effects were observed for CMC. Both micro- and nanocellulose were able to improve the elastic modulus and reduce the thermal expansion coefficient and creep compliance of the adhesive, with effects more pronounced for CNC nanoparticles. Finally, single-lap shear test on bonded ancient oil painting substrates confirmed the improved dimensional stability of the joint imparted by CNC in the adhesive under both quasi-static and creep conditions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cataldi, A., Berglund, L., Deflorian, F., & Pegoretti, A. (2015). A comparison between micro- and nanocellulose-filled composite adhesives for oil paintings restoration. Nanocomposites, 1(4), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/20550324.2015.1117239

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free