“The architect of the invasion” vs. “a symbol of resilience”: How AI chatbots frame Zelenskyy, Putin and the Russia–Ukraine war

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This qualitative content analysis conducted in November 2024 examines how four AI chatbots – OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Microsoft’s Copilot, Google’s Gemini, and Anthropic’s Claude – frame the Russia–Ukraine war. The chatbots generally utilized similar emphasis, tonality, and moral judgements as most US and European news organizations, with Russia framed as an “aggressor” and Ukraine as a victim of the aggression. These framing similarities were even more pronounced in outputs for Russian and Ukrainian identity-specific prompts. However, AI chatbots had a hard time contextualizing Russian government propaganda. Thus, AI chatbots are unreliable narrators, prone to bias and a superficial understanding of complex geopolitical realities. Until these fundamental issues of reliability and bias are resolved, AI chatbots as news sources should be treated with significant skepticism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roman, N., Laba, N., & Parmelee, J. H. (2026). “The architect of the invasion” vs. “a symbol of resilience”: How AI chatbots frame Zelenskyy, Putin and the Russia–Ukraine war. Media, War and Conflict. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352261435520

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free