Work disability rates in RA. Results from an inception cohort with 24 years follow-up

32Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective. To explore rates of and reasons for work disability in an early RA cohort with median 10 years follow-up. Methods. One thousand four hundred and sixty patients with early RA (<2 years symptom duration) and no prior DMARD therapy were recruited from nine rheumatology outpatient departments across the UK between 1986 and 1998. Standard clinical, laboratory and radiological assessments were recorded at 6-monthly and yearly intervals. Assessment of employment included details of type and hours of paid work. The main outcomes investigated were rates of and main reasons for work cessation, analysed by age of onset of RA (<45, 45-60 years) and year of recruitment to the study (before or after 1992). Results. Maximum follow-up was 24 years, median 10 years. Of 647 patients in paid work at baseline, the majority were <60 years old (91%). The estimated probability of stopping work due to RA was highest in patients with older age of onset (45-60 years) who were recruited before 1992, but improved in those recruited from 1992 to 1998 (P < 0.01). There was no difference seen over the study recruitment years in younger age of onset patients. Conclusion. Work loss related to RA occurred much earlier than for other reasons, especially in the first 5 years of RA, but improved in the later recruitment period. Work disability is multifactorial, and the gradual changes in therapies used over time in this cohort may be one explanation for the secular differences seen. © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nikiphorou, E., Guh, D., Bansback, N., Zhang, W., Dixey, J., Williams, P., & Young, A. (2012). Work disability rates in RA. Results from an inception cohort with 24 years follow-up. Rheumatology, 51(2), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ker401

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free