A rational approach to uninvestigated dyspepsia in primary care: Review of the literature

17Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper the rationale and limitations of the four most important approach strategies to dyspepsia in primary care (empiric treatment, prompt endoscopy, "test-and-scope", and "test-and-treat") are analysed. It is concluded that in the absence of alarm symptoms, a "test-and-treat" approach is currently the most rational approach provided that three conditions are met: (1) a highly accurate test should be used, (2) the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in the population should not be too low, and (3) an effective anti-H pylori regimen should be prescribed taking sufficient time to instruct and motivate the patient.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arents, N. L. A., Thijs, J. C., & Kleibeuker, J. H. (2002, December 1). A rational approach to uninvestigated dyspepsia in primary care: Review of the literature. Postgraduate Medical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1136/pmj.78.926.707

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free