Detection of rubella-specific immunoglobulin G: Comparison of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and an automated microparticle enzyme immunoassay (IMx)

5Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

An automated microparticle enzyme immunoassay (IMx Rubella IgG Antibody Assay; Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill.) was compared with a conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection of rubella-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) in 400 consecutive antenatal patients. There was complete agreement between the two tests in this population, which had a positivity rate of 99% for rubella-specific IgG antibodies. The performance of the IMx was also evaluated at the cutoff zone by assaying 64 selected antenatal serum samples with low or negative rubella antibody titers as determined by ELISA. Overall, the IMx was found to be a specific, sensitive assay for the detection of rubella-specific IgG and is virtually fully automated for easy performance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Skurrie, I. J., Head, J. L., & Garland, S. M. (1991). Detection of rubella-specific immunoglobulin G: Comparison of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and an automated microparticle enzyme immunoassay (IMx). Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.29.8.1752-1753.1991

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free