Prospective cohort study investigating frequency and risk factors for acute pain 1 day after refractive surgery

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/aims To examine demographic and clinical factors associated with ocular pain 1 day after refractive surgery. Methods Prospective study of individuals undergoing refractive surgery. Participants rated their ocular pain on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) presurgery and 1 day after surgery. Presurgery, participants completed questionnaires on demographics, comorbidities, medications and dry eye and ocular pain symptoms; and an anaesthetised Schirmer test was performed. Acute ocular pain 1 day after surgery was defined as an NRS score of worst pain since surgery ≥3 and this group was compared with individuals with NRS scores<3. Results 251 individuals underwent refractive surgery (89% laser-Assisted in situ keratomileusis, n=222; 11% PRK, n=29). Mean age was 35±8 years (range 19 to 60); 60% (n=150) self-identified as female, 80% (n=203) as White, and 36% (n=89) as Hispanic. Thirteen (5%) individuals reported ocular pain (NRS ≥3) prior to surgery and 67% (n=168) reported ocular pain 1 day after surgery (nine individuals had pain at both time points). Factors that were associated with pain 1 day after surgery included Hispanic ethnicity (adjusted relative risk (aRR) 1.42, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.68, p<0.001) and the presence of eye pain presurgery (aRR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.18, p=0.02). Conclusion A majority of individuals report moderate or greater pain within 24 hours of refractive surgery. Hispanic ethnicity and eye pain prior to surgery were associated with self-reported acute postsurgical pain.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Betz, J., Locatelli, E. V. T., Harkness, B. M., Perez-Blanco, M., Everist, S. J., Chen, S., … Galor, A. (2024). Prospective cohort study investigating frequency and risk factors for acute pain 1 day after refractive surgery. BMJ Open Ophthalmology, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001624

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free