The necessary shift from diagnostic to prognostic research

25Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Do doctors really need to establish an etiological diagnosis each time a patient presents? Or might it often be more effective to treat simply on the basis of symptoms and signs alone, relying on research and on our experience of outcomes for patients who presented in similar ways in the past?. Discussion. At a time of increase health care costs especially in pharmaceuticals and expensive diagnostic tests, this article uses examples from recent research to address this question. Our examples come from general practice, because that is where doctors frequently see patients presenting with a yet undifferentiated disease which is consequently difficult to diagnose. The examples include respiratory tract infections, low back pain and shoulder pain. Finally we discuss the 'something is wrong' feeling. Summary. We conclude that, in addition to diagnostic research, a renewed focus on prognostic research is needed. © 2007 Dinant et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dinant, G. J. G. J., Buntinx, F. F., & Butler, C. C. C. (2007). The necessary shift from diagnostic to prognostic research. BMC Family Practice. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-8-53

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free