The Effects of Assisted Return Programmes on Sustainable Reintegration: A Review

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Assisted Return (AR) programmes have grown in number and size over the past decade and there is an increasing body of evidence on these programmes. However, the existing evidence has not yet been systematically synthesised. Recognising the controversy over the programmes, this article reviews the current evidence regarding the effectiveness and effects of AR programmes that aim to facilitate sustainable reintegration of return migrants. Reviewing 46 sources, the findings highlight the different programme modalities, contextual factors and individual and group factors that influence sustainable reintegration. Overall, the available evidence suggests that despite short-term relief from AR programmes, there is overall scant and—where it exists—often highly contextual and relatively weak evidence of longer-term effects on sustainable reintegration. The review is limited by conceptual, methodological and geographic heterogeneity in the available studies. The article concludes by suggesting practical implications and highlighting potential for future research on support for sustainable reintegration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kuschminder, K., Tan, S. E., Jechel, L., Schmitt, J., & Bruder, M. (2026). The Effects of Assisted Return Programmes on Sustainable Reintegration: A Review. International Migration, 64(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.70122

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free