Intravenous sildenafil for postoperative pulmonary hypertension in children with congenital heart disease

70Citations
Citations of this article
115Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous sildenafil for immediate postoperative pulmonary hypertension (PH) in pediatric patients undergoing congenital heart surgery. Methods: A double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, parallel-group trial was conducted. Patients were randomized to one of three doses of intravenous sildenafil, or placebo, for a minimum of 24 h. Results: The study was heavily underpowered. Whereas enrollment of 228 patients (57 per treatment arm) was required to achieve the sample size estimate to detect difference between arms, the sponsor terminated the study after 15 months owing to slow patient accrual. Seventeen patients (median age 5 months) experiencing postoperative PH were randomized and treated, five with placebo and four each with low-, medium-, and high-dose sildenafil. In the first 24 h, 40% of placebo and 17% of sildenafil patients required additional therapy (p = 0.330). Median time to extubation (3 versus 8 days, p = 0.023) and intensive care unit stay (6 versus 15 days, p = 0.008) were shorter for sildenafil patients. Mean ± standard deviation systolic pulmonary artery pressure was reduced with sildenafil (46 ± 11 to 35 ± 6 mmHg, p = 0.027 versus placebo). No adverse events or systemic hypotension were attributed to sildenafil. Conclusion: Intravenous sildenafil reduced pulmonary artery pressure and shortened time to extubation and intensive care unit stay in children with postoperative PH. © 2010 Copyright jointly held by Springer and ESICM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fraisse, A., Butrous, G., Taylor, M. B., Oakes, M., Dilleen, M., & Wessel, D. L. (2011). Intravenous sildenafil for postoperative pulmonary hypertension in children with congenital heart disease. Intensive Care Medicine, 37(3), 502–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-010-2065-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free