Is vitamin C supplementation beneficial? Lessons learned from randomised controlled trials

166Citations
Citations of this article
177Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In contrast to the promised antioxidant miracle of the 1980s, several randomised controlled trials have shown no effect of antioxidant supplements on hard endpoints such as morbidity and mortality. The former over-optimistic attitude has clearly called for a more realistic assessment of the benefit:harm ratio of antioxidant supplements. We have examined the literature on vitamin C intervention with the intention of drawing a conclusion on its possible beneficial or deleterious effect on health and the result is discouraging. One of several important issues is that vitamin C uptake is tightly controlled, resulting in a wide-ranging bioavailability depending on the current vitamin C status. Lack of proper selection criteria dominates the currently available literature. Thus, while supplementation with vitamin C is likely to be without effect for the majority of the Western population due to saturation through their normal diet, there could be a large subpopulation with a potential health problem that remains uninvestigated. The present review discusses the relevance of the available literature on vitamin C supplementation and proposes guidelines for future randomised intervention trials. © 2009 The Authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lykkesfeldt, J., & Poulsen, H. E. (2010, May). Is vitamin C supplementation beneficial? Lessons learned from randomised controlled trials. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114509993229

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free