Smartwatch-based ventilatory assessment for COPD screening: A diagnostic accuracy study

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: COPD underdiagnosis persists in China due to limited spirometry access. Smart wearables enabling cough and physiological monitoring (SpO2, respiratory rate) offer a scalable screening solution. Methods: Participants were randomly allocated to training and validation cohorts. All underwent cough sound recordings, smartwatch monitoring (heart rate variability, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation), and pre-/post-bronchodilator spirometry. Machine learning algorithms extracted cough sound features to predict lung function (evaluated via MAE, Pearson correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis). These predictions were combined with physiological data in a multimodal COPD screening model, with diagnostic performance assessed against physician diagnosis. Results: The training cohort included 178 patients (112 males) with COPD or pulmonary dysfunctions, aged 54.42 ± 14.77 years, BMI 24.81 ± 3.73 kg/m², FVC 3.64 ± 1.09 L, and FEV12.42 ± 0.96 L, alongside 298 healthy volunteers (151 males) aged 35.3 ± 12.35 years, BMI 22.62 ± 3.12 kg/m², FVC 3.63 ± 0.89 L, and FEV13.14 ± 0.73 L. The validation cohort comprised 47 COPD patients (35 males) aged 65.53 ± 7.62 years, BMI 25.38 ± 4.38 kg/m², FVC 3.27 ± 0.59 L, and FEV11.91 ± 0.50 L, and 71 healthy controls (27 males) aged 45.51 ± 12.15 years, BMI 25.79 ± 4.00 kg/m², FVC 3.35 ± 0.80 L, and FEV12.72 ± 0.67 L. Using cough sounds, the model's mean absolute error for FEV1/FVC, FVC%, and FEV1% prediction was 7.4%, 10.6%, and 17.78% ( Table 3 – 5), respectively, compared to spirometry. Significant correlations were found between predicted and measured FVC (r = 0.798, P < 0.001), FEV1(r = 0.752, P < 0.001), and FEV1/FVC (r = 0.784, < 0.001) ( Table 6). Combined with physiological parameters, our model's overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for differentiating between COPD and normal controls were 87.82%, 86.96%, and 87.73% ( Table 9). Conclusion: Our wearable-based algorithm effectively screens for ventilatory dysfunction and COPD, showing potential for large-scale population screening to reduce medical burdens. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry of the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform of the World Health Organization ChiCTR2100050843; Registration Date: 2021-9-4 Clinical Trial Number: ChiCTR2100050843. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=126556

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, Y., Cao, L., Zhao, D., Meng, S., Li, D., Li, J., … Xie, L. (2025). Smartwatch-based ventilatory assessment for COPD screening: A diagnostic accuracy study. Digital Health, 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251377938

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free