A comparison of satellite and in situ-based sea surface temperature climatologies

183Citations
Citations of this article
114Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

A satellite-derived sea surface temperature (SST) climatology based on Pathfinder Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) data is evaluated using two long-term observational collections of in situ SST measurements: the 1994 World Ocean Atlas (WOA94) and the Comprehensive Ocean-Atmosphere Data Set (COADS). Using the statistical comparison method, the performance of this 'Pathfinder + erosion' climatology is compared with the performance of the WOA94 1° in situ climatology, the Reynolds satellite and in situ blended 1° analysis, version 2.2 of the blended 1° Global Sea-Ice and Sea Surface Temperature (GISST) climatology, and the in situ 5° Global Ocean Surface Temperature Atlas (GOSTA). Overall, the Pathfinder + erosion climatology yields lower anomaly variances in the mid- and high latitudes and the Southern Hemisphere, but larger variances than the 1° climatologies in the warm, Northern Hemisphere low-latitude regions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Casey, K. S., & Cornillon, P. (1999). A comparison of satellite and in situ-based sea surface temperature climatologies. Journal of Climate, 12(6), 1848–1863. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<1848:ACOSAI>2.0.CO;2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free