Renal recovery after acute kidney injury: Choice of initial renal replacement therapy modality still matters

5Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Renal replacement therapy can be applied either in an intermittent fashion or in a continuous fashion in severe acute kidney injury. To date, no modality has been shown to consistently improve patient survival. In the study recently reported by Sun and colleagues, continuous application of renal replacement therapy was associated with improved renal recovery, defined by lower risk of long-term need for chronic dialysis therapy. This association between nonrecovery and intermittent renal replacement therapy may be explained by a higher rate of hypotensive episodes and the lower capacity for fluid removal during the first 72 hours of therapy. Altogether, this study adds to the growing body of evidence to suggest improved likelihood of recovery of kidney function in critically ill survivors of AKI with continuous modalities for renal replacement therapy. © 2014 Schneider and Bagshaw; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schneider, A. G., & Bagshaw, S. M. (2014, June 20). Renal recovery after acute kidney injury: Choice of initial renal replacement therapy modality still matters. Critical Care. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13936

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free