Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Kangfuxin Liquid on Diabetic Patients with Skin Ulcers

17Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this study, we used meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the clinical efficacy of Kangfuxin Liquid in the treatment of diabetic patients with skin ulcers. Literature search was performed through PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data. The retrieval was not limited by language, and the search period was from 2010 to October 12, 2020. Diabetic patients with skin ulcers were treated with Kangfuxin Liquid combined with basic treatment as the treatment group and only basic treatment as the control group. Stata16.0 software was used for system evaluation. A total of 11 studies and 874 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that 11 studies compared the treatment efficacy between the two groups, and the results showed that the treatment efficacy in the treatment group was significantly higher than that in the control group [OR = 5.38, 95% CI (3.52, 8.24), P<0.001]. Among them, 9 studies compared the healing time of wounds. The healing time of the treatment group was significantly longer than that of the control group [SMD = -2.13, 95% CI (-2.85, -1.41), P<0.001]. Five studies compared the length of stay, and the length of stay in the treatment group was shorter than that in the control group [SMD = -3.68, 95% CI (-5.38, -1.97), P<0.001]. Compared with basic treatment, Kangfuxin Liquid combined with basic treatment has an ideal effect in the treatment of diabetic skin ulcers, which can improve the overall treatment efficiency and shorten the wound rehabilitation time and the length of stay.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wan, X., Gen, F., Sheng, Y., Ou, M., Wang, F., Peng, T., & Guo, J. (2021). Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Kangfuxin Liquid on Diabetic Patients with Skin Ulcers. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1334255

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free