The Validity of Impressions as a Media Dose Metric in a Tobacco Public Education Campaign Evaluation: Observational Study

2Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Evaluation research increasingly needs alternatives to target or gross rating points to comprehensively measure total exposure to modern multichannel public education campaigns that use multiple channels, including TV, radio, digital video, and paid social media, among others. Ratings data typically only capture delivery of broadcast media (TV and radio) and excludes other channels. Studies are needed to validate objective cross-channel metrics such as impressions against self-reported exposure to campaign messages. Objective: This study aimed to examine whether higher a volume of total media campaign impressions is predictive of individual-level self-reported campaign exposure in California. Methods: We analyzed over 3 years of advertisement impressions from the California Tobacco Prevention Program’s statewide tobacco education campaigns from August 2019 through December 2022. Impressions data varied across designated market areas (DMAs) and across time. These data were merged to individual respondents from 45 waves of panel survey data of Californians aged 18-55 years (N=151,649). Impressions were merged to respondents based on respondents’ DMAs and time of survey completion. We used logistic regression to estimate the odds of respondents’ campaign recall as a function of cumulative and past 3-month impressions delivered to each respondent’s DMA. Results: Cumulative impressions were positively and significantly associated with recall of each of the Flavors Hook Kids (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davis, K., Curry, L., Bradfield, B., Stupplebeen, D. A., Williams, R. J., Soria, S., & Lautsch, J. (2024). The Validity of Impressions as a Media Dose Metric in a Tobacco Public Education Campaign Evaluation: Observational Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26. https://doi.org/10.2196/55311

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free