Abstract
Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and percutaneous acetic acid injection (PAI) are effective treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We have conducted a prospective study to compare the efficacy of sequential TACE and PAI (TACE-PAI) versus repeated PAI therapy for HCC. Patients and methods: A total of 108 HCC patients with tumor size ≤5 cm were enrolled. Fifty-three patients were treated with TACE-PAI and 55 patients were treated with PAI alone. Results: Objective responses were achieved in 72 of 80 nodules (90%) in the TACE-PAI group compared with 51 of 62 nodules (82%) in the PAI group (P = 0.217) during 24 ± 10 months of follow-up. Patients in the TACE-PAI group had a significantly lower cumulative tumor recurrence rate from the treated nodule (P = 0.004) or newly developed tumor elsewhere in liver (P = 0.010). Complete tumor necrosis in large (3-5 cm HCCs was more frequently encountered in the TACE-PAI group (64% versus 37%; P = 0.034). There was no significant survival difference between the two groups with small (≤3 cm) HCC (P = 0.569), whereas PAI therapy was an independent poor prognostic predictor [relative risk 3.0 (95% confidence interval 1.2-7.6); P = 0.017] in the large HCC group. Conclusions: Sequential therapy with TACE and PAI is superior to repeated PAI alone for patients with large HCC.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Huo, T. I., Huang, Y. H., Wu, J. C., Chiang, J. H., Lee, P. C., Chang, F. Y., & Dee, S. D. (2003). Sequential transarterial chemoembolization and percutaneous acetic acid injection therapy versus repeated percutaneous acetic acid injection for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective study. Annals of Oncology, 14(11), 1648–1653. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdg460
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.