Interaction of verapamil and other calcium channel blockers with α1- and α2-adrenergic receptors

173Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To determine the specificity of the previously demonstrated competition of verapamil with radioligand binding to α-adrenergic receptors, we examined the interaction of calcium channel blocker with α1- and α2-adrenergic receptors on several tissues. Verapamil competed for [3H] prazosin binding to α1-adrenergic receptors and for [3H]yohimbine binding to α2-adrenergic receptors in several tissues (human platelets, rat kidney and heart, and cultured muscle cells) with dissociation constants of 0.6-6 μM. The calcium channel blockers D600, D591, fendiline, and prenylamine - which are structural analogues of verapamil - also competed for [3H]yohimbine binding to human platelets. Two other calcium channel blockers, diltiazem and nifedipine, did not compete for [3H]yohimbine binding to human platelets or [3H]prazosin binding to membranes prepared from rat ventricles. We used [3H]nitrendipine binding to identify putative calcium channels on rat myocardial membranes. Nifedipine and verapamil blocked these [3H]nitrendipine-binding sites on ventricular membranes, but epinephrine and prazosin did not, indicating that the ventricular α1 receptors and calcium channels are distinct. We found no specific [3H]nitrendipine binding to human platelets. We conclude that the interaction of verapamil with α-adrenergic receptors is not receptor subtype or tissue specific, that interaction with α-adrenergic receptors is not a property of all calcium channel blockers, and that the interaction of verapamil with α-adrenergic receptors and its interaction with calcium channels occur at at least two distinct sites.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Motulsky, H. J., Snavely, M. D., Hughes, R. J., & Insel, P. A. (1983). Interaction of verapamil and other calcium channel blockers with α1- and α2-adrenergic receptors. Circulation Research, 52(2), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.52.2.226

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free