Abstract
Most of the hypotheses put forward to explain glacial-interglacial cycles in atmospheric pCO2 are centred on Southern-Ocean-based mechanisms. This is in large part because: (1) timing constraints rule out changes in the North Atlantic as the trigger; (2) the concept of "high-latitude sensitivity" eliminates changes in the non-polar oceans as likely contenders. Many of the Southern-Ocean-based mechanisms for changing atmospheric pCO2 on glacial-interglacial time-scales are based on results from highly simplified box models with prescribed flow fields and fixed particulate flux. It has been argued that box models are significantly more "high-latitude sensitive" than General Circulation Models. In light of this, it is important to understand whether this high-latitude sensitivity is a feature common to all box models, and whether the apparent degree of sensitivity changes for different tracers and parameters. We introduce a new metric for assessing how "high-latitude sensitive" a particular solution is to perturbations. With this metric, we demonstrate that a given model may be high-latitude sensitive to certain parameters but not to others. We find that the incorporation of a dynamic-based flow field and a Michaelis-Menten type nutrient feedback can have a significant impact on the apparent sensitivity of the model to perturbations. The implications of this for current box-model-based estimates of atmospheric pCO2 drawdown are discussed. © Blackwell Munksgaard, 2006.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Lane, E., Peacock, S., & Restrepo, J. M. (2006). A dynamic-flow carbon-cycle box model and high-latitude sensitivity. Tellus, Series B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 58(4), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2006.00192.x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.