An investigation into the variability of rugby union small-sided game demands and the effect of pitch size and player number manipulation

5Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study aimed to quantify the variability of physical, technical, and subjective task-load demands in small-sided games (SSGs), and the effect of manipulating of pitch size and player numbers in SSG in adolescent rugby union (RU) players. Twenty-six subjects completed six conditions in a crossover study design. In each condition subjects played 4 × 3-min periods of an SSG. Games were completed with either 4 × 4, 6 × 6 or 12 × 12 players on either a small (W: 25 m, L: 30 m), medium (W: 30 m, L: 40 m), or large (W: 35 m, L: 50 m) sized pitch. Match demands were assessed using global navigation satellite systems, heart rate (HR) monitors, ratings of perceived exertion, National Aeronautical Space Association task-load index and video analysis. Statistical analysis comprised of typical error, coefficient of variation (CV) and intra-class correlations to assess variability, and the use of linear mixed effects modelling to assess differences between conditions. A range of variability was observed in technical (CV = 25.00% to 52.38%), physical (CV = 4.12% to 51.18%) and subjective task-loads (CV = 7.65% to 17.14%) between identical games. Reducing player numbers increased physical demands such as m/min (ES range = 0.45 to 1.45), technical exposures such as total involvements (ES range = 0.04 to 0.63) and effort, physical and temporal task-loads. Increasing pitch size caused greater movement demands such as m/min (ES range = 0.11 to 0.79), but did not change the technical demands.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dudley, C., Johnston, R., Jones, B., Hacking, T., McCafferty, R., & Weakley, J. (2024). An investigation into the variability of rugby union small-sided game demands and the effect of pitch size and player number manipulation. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 19(4), 1546–1559. https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541231220288

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free