Understanding First Nations rights and perspectives on the use of herbicides in forestry: A case study from northeastern Ontario

9Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article provides forestry professionals with an improved understanding of why First Nations are opposed to the use of chemical herbicides for silvicultural purposes on their traditional lands, based on a case study in northeastern Ontario. Results were generated using a modified form of a focus group approach. First Nations opposition to herbicide use involved not only concerns over human and environmental health (concerns common among the general public) but also spanned from treaty rights, mistrust, and respect issues to herbicide use being incongruent with traditional First Nations worldviews. The results illustrate that the science-education approach typically used to address public opposition to herbicides is neither adequate nor appropriate for addressing First Nations concerns. Instead, a more in-depth engagement and approach, centred on genuine respect for First Nations rights, culture and history, is needed to arrive at solutions that are consistent with each First Nation community's values and terms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kayahara, G. J., & Armstrong, C. L. (2015). Understanding First Nations rights and perspectives on the use of herbicides in forestry: A case study from northeastern Ontario. Forestry Chronicle, 91(2), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc2015-024

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free