Use of endpoints in phase III randomized controlled trials for acute myeloid leukemia over the last 15 years: a systematic review

3Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We systematically evaluated the primary and secondary endpoints used in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We included 238 phase III AML RCTs in the past 15 years that reported 279 primary endpoints and 657 secondary endpoints. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), and complete remission (CR) were primary endpoints in 120 (43%), 34 (12%), 30 (11%), and 41 (15%) studies, respectively. OS (12.5%), PFS (13.2%), CR (14%), safety (11%), and EFS (9%) were commonly reported secondary endpoints. Among primary endpoints, a higher use of OS (OR 2.03, 95%CI 1.10–3.75, p = 0.023) and lower use of PFS (OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.12–0.52, p < 0.001) was observed from 2014 to 2021 compared to 2006–2013; CR was frequently used in relapsed/refractory compared to frontline RCTs (OR 2.20, 95%CI 1.11–4.38, p = 0.025); EFS was frequently used in frontline compared to relapsed/refractory AML RCTs (OR 10.11, 95%CI 1.34–76.34, p = 0.025). A higher trend in the use of clinically meaningful and objective endpoint of OS over the last 15 years.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shahzad, M., Chaudhary, S. G., Tariq, E., Mushtaq, A. H., Anwar, I., Ahmed, N., … Mushtaq, M. U. (2023). Use of endpoints in phase III randomized controlled trials for acute myeloid leukemia over the last 15 years: a systematic review. Leukemia and Lymphoma. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2022.2136947

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free