Anti-thrombotic therapy strategies with long-term anticoagulation after percutaneous coronary intervention – a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Siddiqui W
  • Khan M
  • Rawala M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Long-term oral anticoagulants (OAC) increases bleeding risk after the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with Aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors. We hypothesize that dual anti-thrombotic therapy (DATT) reduces bleeding without increased cardiovascular events. Objectives: DATT does not increase adverse cardiovascular events compared to triple anti-thrombotic therapy (TATT). Method: We searched MEDLINE, PUBMED, Google Scholar, Cochrane and EMBASE from inception to 6 April 2019 for randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing DATT to TATT after PCI. Results: We identified 641 citations (411 after excluding duplicates). Four RCTs with 5,317 patients (3,039 on DATT vs 2,278 on TATT) were included. DATT arm showed significantly reduced [total bleeding, 731 vs. 784, odds ratio [OR] = 0.51, Confidence Interval [CI] = 0.39-0.67, p < 0.00001, I2 = 71% (I2 = 0% without WOEST study)], [TIIMI major bleeding 60 vs. 80, OR = 0.56, CI = 0.4-0.79, p = 0.0009, I2 = 0%], and [TIIMI minor bleeding, 70 vs 126, OR = 0.43, CI = 0.32-0.59, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%]. There was no difference in subsequent strokes, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and mortality. A trend towards decreased non-cardiac deaths with DATT was observed, 14 vs 26, OR = 0.55, CI = 0.27-1.10, p = 0.09, I2 = 6%.Conclusions: DATT is associated with significantly reduced bleeding and a trend towards reduced non-cardiac death with no difference in adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Siddiqui, W. J., Khan, M. Y., Rawala, M. S., Jethwani, K., Khan, M. H., Alvarez, C., … Eisen, H. (2019). Anti-thrombotic therapy strategies with long-term anticoagulation after percutaneous coronary intervention – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives, 9(3), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2019.1611330

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free