Restoration of Fingerprints from a Mummified Cadaver

  • Iwakami E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Fingerprints are widely used as the most reliable means of individual identification in forensic science. However, postmortem changes of the skin always make it difficult to obtain fingerprints. To restore fingerprints of mummified cadavers, various reagents have been used. In recent years, commercially available embalming agents for cadaver restoration and preservation have been evaluated, but they have not been sufficiently compared. In this study, we successfully restored fingerprints from a highly dried, almost mummified, unidentified cadaver. Five methods were attempted to restore fingerprints: three used previously reported reagents and two used commercially available embalming solutions at room temperature. The fingers were observed grossly after immersion for 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 days. When all the specimens were well restored, fingerprints were taken by the inked impression method and by an were more effective to restore CO3, and Sofner® indirect method using silicone rubber. The results indicated that Na2 clear fingerprints. The other solutions failed to produce optimal tissue softening and swelling, and the dermal ridges were useful in that they restored better were ill-defined. The conventional Na2 CO3 and the newly tested Sofner® were useful in that they restored better fingerprints in a shorter duration. Na2CO3 CO3 and the newly tested Sofner® were useful in that they restored better fingerprints in a shorter duration. Na2CO3 has to be prepared before use, can be used by simply were ill-defined. The conventional Na2 CO3 and the newly tested Sofner® were useful in that they restored better fingerprints in a shorter duration. Na2CO3 has to be prepared before use, whereas Sofner® diluting with water.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Iwakami, E. (2013). Restoration of Fingerprints from a Mummified Cadaver. Journal of Forensic Research, 04(02). https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7145.s6-001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free