World health organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - A hard nut to crack (Review)

135Citations
Citations of this article
232Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In May 2011 the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) evaluated cancer risks from radiofre-quency (RF) radiation. Human epidemiological studies gave evidence of increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma. RF radiation was classified as Group 2B, a possible human carcinogen. Further epidemiological, animal and mechanistic studies have strengthened the association. In spite of this, in most countries little or nothing has been done to reduce exposure and educate people on health hazards from RF radiation. On the contrary ambient levels have increased. In 2014 the WHO launched a draft of a Monograph on RF fields and health for public comments. It turned out that five of the six members of the Core Group in charge of the draft are affiliated with International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), an industry loyal NGO, and thus have a serious confict of interest. Just as by ICNIRP, evaluation of non-thermal biological effects from RF radiation are dismissed as scientific evidence of adverse health effects in the Monograph. This has provoked many comments sent to the WHO. However, at a meeting on March 3, 2017 at the WHO Geneva office it was stated that the WHO has no intention to change the Core Group.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hardell, L. (2017). World health organization, radiofrequency radiation and health - A hard nut to crack (Review). International Journal of Oncology, 51(2), 405–413. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.4046

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free