A PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH TO MOND: Assessing the Milgromian Research Program in Cosmology

47Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Dark matter is a fundamental component of the standard cosmological model, but in spite of four decades of increasingly sensitive searches, no-one has yet detected a single dark-matter particle in the laboratory. An alternative cosmological paradigm exists: MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics). Observations explained in the standard model by postulating dark matter are described in MOND by proposing a modification of Newton's laws of motion. Both MOND and the standard model have had successes and failures – but only MOND has repeatedly predicted observational facts in advance of their discovery. In this volume, David Merritt outlines why such predictions are considered by many philosophers of science to be the 'gold standard' when it comes to judging a theory's validity. In a world where the standard model receives most attention, the author applies criteria from the philosophy of science to assess, in a systematic way, the viability of this alternative cosmological paradigm.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Merritt, D. (2020). A PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH TO MOND: Assessing the Milgromian Research Program in Cosmology. A Philosophical Approach to Mond: Assessing the Milgromian Research Program in Cosmology (pp. 1–270). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108610926

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free