Deep-Masker: A Deep Learning–based Tool to Assess Chord Length from Murine Lung Images

5Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Chord length is an indirect measure of alveolar size and a critical endpoint in animal models of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In assessing chord length, the lumens of nonalveolar structures are eliminated from measurement by various methods, including manual masking. However, manual masking is resource intensive and can introduce variability and bias. We created a fully automated deep learning–based tool to mask murine lung images and assess chord length to facilitate mechanistic and therapeutic discovery in COPD called Deep-Masker (available at http://47.93.0.75:8110/login). We trained the deep learning algorithm for Deep-Masker using 1,217 images from 137 mice from 12 strains exposed to room air or cigarette smoke for 6 months. We validated this algorithm against manual masking. Deep-Masker demonstrated high accuracy with an average difference in chord length compared with manual masking of 20.3 6 1.4% (rs = 0.99) for room-air–exposed mice and 0.7 6 1.9% (rs = 0.99) for cigarette-smoke–exposed mice. The difference between Deep-Masker and manually masked images for change in chord length because of cigarette smoke exposure was 6.0 6 9.2% (rs = 0.95). These values exceed published estimates for interobserver variability for manual masking (rs = 0.65) and the accuracy of published algorithms by a significant margin. We validated the performance of Deep-Masker using an independent set of images. Deep-Masker can be an accurate, precise, fully automated method to standardize chord length measurement in murine models of lung disease.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pu, J., Leme, A. S., de Lima e Silva, C., Beeche, C., Nyunoya, T., Konigshoff, M., & Chandra, D. (2023). Deep-Masker: A Deep Learning–based Tool to Assess Chord Length from Murine Lung Images. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, 69(2), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2023-0051MA

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free