Environmental factors function as constraints on soil nitrous oxide fluxes in bioenergy feedstock cropping systems

6Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Nitrous oxide (N 2 O) is a potent greenhouse gas and major component of the net global warming potential of bioenergy feedstock cropping systems. Numerous environmental factors influence soil N 2 O production, making direct correlation difficult to any one factor of N 2 O fluxes under field conditions. We instead employed quantile regression to evaluate whether soil temperature, water-filled pore space (WFPS), and concentrations of soil nitrate (NO 2- ) and ammonium (NH 4+ ) determined upper bounds for soil N 2 O flux magnitudes. We collected data over 6 years from a range of bioenergy feedstock cropping systems including no-till grain crops, perennial warm-season grasses, hybrid poplar, and polycultures of tallgrass prairie species each with and without nitrogen (N) addition grown at two sites. The upper bounds for soil N 2 O fluxes had a significant and positive correlation with all four environmental factors, although relatively large fluxes were still possible at minimal values for nearly all factors. The correlation with NH 4+ was generally weaker, suggesting it is less important than NO 2- in driving large fluxes. Quantile regression slopes were generally lower for unfertilized perennials than for other systems, but this may have resulted from a perpetual state of nitrogen limitation, which prevented other factors from being clear constraints. This framework suggests efforts to reduce concentrations of NO 2- in the soil may be effective at reducing high-intensity periods—”hot moments”—of N 2 O production.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duncan, D. S., Oates, L. G., Gelfand, I., Millar, N., Robertson, G. P., & Jackson, R. D. (2019). Environmental factors function as constraints on soil nitrous oxide fluxes in bioenergy feedstock cropping systems. GCB Bioenergy, 11(2), 416–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12572

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free