P2P: Assessing a Peer Evaluation Strategy

  • Chang C
  • Pearman C
  • Farha N
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of peer evaluation in a performance-based, Web-enhanced undergraduate instructional technology course. The results of a survey administered at the end of three semesters indicated that learners believe the peer evaluation process helped them improve the quality of their own work, both as a result of being a peer evaluator themselves and from the quality of the feedback received from their classmate-evaluators. Higher quality final projects with fewer mistakes corroborated the students' assessment. These findings provide valuable information for instructors who are currently utilizing or considering the implementation of a peer evaluation process as a part of their instructional strategy. The results of this study indicate that including peer evaluation in the final project enhanced student performance. Significant technology integration was used to facilitate the projects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chang, C.-W., Pearman, C. J., & Farha, N. W. (2010). P2P: Assessing a Peer Evaluation Strategy. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0301.06

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free