Validity evidence of a task trainer for normal and difficult lumbar puncture: A cross-sectional study

1Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Validation of the anatomically complex configurations of the Lumbar Puncture Simulator II (KYOTO KAGAKU CO., LTD., 15 Kitanekoya-cho Fushimi-ku Kyoto, Japan 612-8388) have not been reported. Previous validation of the normal anatomic configuration has been reported. This study aims to evaluate evidence for construct and content validity of 4 interchangeable lumbar puncture (LP) complex anatomic configurations of this simulator.We performed a cross-sectional study between April 2018 and May 2019. Novice volunteer medical students and expert physicians who had performed over 30 LP procedures performed sequential LP procedures on each of 4 simulated interchangeable anatomic LP puncture blocks (normal, obesity, geriatric, combined geriatric/obesity). Primary outcome measures compared between groups for each LP procedure were return of cerebrospinal fluid within 5 minutes and a calculated performance score. Subjective face validity and content validity 5-point Likert questionnaires were completed by participants.35 novice (n=19) and expert (n=16) subjects completed 140 procedures. Significant differences were found between novice and expert groups for both cerebrospinal fluid success rates and performance scores for normal (P=.001/P=.001) geriatric (P=.005/P=.002) and obesity (P=.003/P=

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Akaishi, Y., Okada, Y., Lee-Jayaram, J., Seo, J. S., Yamada, T., & Berg, B. W. (2020). Validity evidence of a task trainer for normal and difficult lumbar puncture: A cross-sectional study. Medicine (United States), 99(41). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022622

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free