Cognitive imperialism in artificial intelligence: counteracting bias with indigenous epistemologies

43Citations
Citations of this article
214Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper presents a novel methodology for integrating indigenous knowledge systems into AI development to counter cognitive imperialism and foster inclusivity. By critiquing the dominance of Western epistemologies and highlighting the risks of bias, the authors argue for incorporating diverse epistemologies. The proposed framework outlines a participatory approach that includes indigenous perspectives, ensuring AI benefits all. The methodology draws from AI ethics, indigenous studies, and postcolonial theory, emphasizing co-creation with indigenous communities, ethical protocols for indigenous data governance, and adaptation of AI algorithms. Case studies in natural language processing, content moderation, and healthcare demonstrate the methodology’s effectiveness and importance. By offering a concrete methodology for decolonizing AI, this paper contributes significantly to AI ethics and social justice, providing a roadmap for equitable, culturally respectful AI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ofosu-Asare, Y. (2025). Cognitive imperialism in artificial intelligence: counteracting bias with indigenous epistemologies. AI and Society, 40(4), 3045–3061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02065-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free