Abstract
Background and Aims Monitoring of chronic Hepatitis C (CHC) treatment relies on HCV RNA quantification by means of real-time PCR methods. Assay specific analytical sensitivities may impact therapy management. Methods Comparative analysis between three commercial assays (Roche COBAS AmpliPrep/ COBAS TaqMan Version 1 (CAP/CTM Ver. 1), Version 2 (CAP/CTM Ver. 2) and the Abbott RealTime HCV (ART) assay) was performed on 247 available samples taken at key decision time points during antiviral therapy of 105 genotype 1 patients (triple therapy: n = 70; dual therapy: n = 35). Results Overall concordance of HCV RNA measurements was high between the two Roche systems (89%; n = 220/247) but lower between the Roche assays and the ART (CAP/CTM Ver. 1 vs ART: 77.3%; n = 191/247 and CAP/CTM v.2 vs ART: 80.1%; n = 198/247). Most discrepancies were noted in week 4/8 samples with residual viremia (
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Strassl, R., Rutter, K., Stättermayer, A. F., Beinhardt, S., Kammer, M., Hofer, H., … Popow-Kraupp, T. (2015). Real-time PCR assays for the quantification of HCV RNA: Concordance, discrepancies and implications for response guided therapy. PLoS ONE, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135963
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.