Time Trial Performance Is Sensitive to Low-Volume Autologous Blood Transfusion

38Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose This study tested the hypothesis that autologous blood transfusion (ABT) of 50% of the red blood cells (RBC) from a standard 450-mL phlebotomy would increase mean power in a cycling time trial. In addition, the study investigated whether further ABT of RBC obtained from another 450-mL phlebotomy would increase repeated cycling sprint ability. Methods In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design (3-month wash-out), nine highly trained male subjects donated two 450-mL blood bags each (BT trial) or were sham phlebotomized (PLA trial). Four weeks later, a 650-kcal time trial (n = 7) was performed 3 d before and 2 h after receiving either 50% (135 mL) of the RBC or a sham transfusion. On the following day, transfusion of RBC (235 mL) from the second donation or sham transfusion was completed. A 4 × 30-s all-out cycling sprint interspersed by 4 min of recovery was performed 6 d before and 3 d after the second ABT (n = 9). Results The mean power was increased in time trials from before to after transfusion (P < 0.05) in BT (213 ± 35 vs 223 ± 38 W; mean ± SD) but not in PLA (223 ± 42 vs 224 ± 46 W). In contrast, the mean power output across the four 30-s sprint bouts remained similar in BT (639 ± 35 vs 644 ± 26 W) and PLA (638 ± 43 vs 639 ± 25 W). Conclusions ABT of only 135 mL of RBC is sufficient to increase mean power in a 650-kcal cycling time trial by 5% in highly trained men. In contrast, a combined high-volume transfusion of 135 and 235 mL of RBC does not alter 4 × 30-s all-out cycling performance interspersed with 4 min of recovery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bejder, J., Andersen, A. B., Solheim, S. A., Gybel-Brask, M., Secher, N. H., Johansson, P. I., & Nordsborg, N. B. (2019). Time Trial Performance Is Sensitive to Low-Volume Autologous Blood Transfusion. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 51(4), 692–700. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001837

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free