Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin Monotherapy Beyond 1 Year After PCI: The Final 5-Year Results of the STOPDAPT-2 ACS and STOPDAPT-2 Total Cohort

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: – Clopidogrel may have ischemic benefit over aspirin as long-term monotherapy in patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: – Both the STOPDAPT-2 (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-2) and STOPDAPT-2 ACS (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-2 Study for the Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome) were multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, randomized clinical trials in Japan, with the same protocol except that the STOPDAPT-2 ACS enrolled patients with acute coronary syndrome, exclusively. The patients after percutaneous coronary intervention with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents were randomized into 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by clopidogrel monotherapy (clopidogrel group) or 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy followed by aspirin monotherapy (aspirin group). Follow-up duration was 5 years. The clinical effect between clopidogrel and aspirin monotherapy was compared by the 1-year landmark analysis in the STOPDAPT-2 ACS and STOPDAPT-2 total cohort, a pooled cohort of the 2 trials. The primary end point was the composite of cardiovascular end point (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or definite stent thrombosis) and bleeding end point (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction major/minor). The major secondary end points were each of the cardiovascular composite end point and the bleeding end point. RESULTS: – Of 2986 patients (clopidogrel group: 1492, aspirin group: 1494) in the 5-year analysis of the STOPDAPT-2 ACS, 2875 (96.3%) completed follow-up. By the 1-year landmark analysis, clopidogrel group was superior to aspirin group for both the primary end point (6.18% and 8.27%; hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.57–0.997]; P=0.048) and the major secondary cardiovascular end point (4.73% and 6.77%; hazard ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.51–0.96]; P=0.03). In the STOPDAPT-2 total cohort, including 5991 patients, the superiority of clopidogrel over aspirin for the cardiovascular end point was highly significant (hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.60–0.91]; P=0.004), although the superiority on the primary end point was insignificant (hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.72–1.03]; P=0.11). There was no between-groups difference in the major secondary bleeding end point, both in the STOPDAPT-2 ACS and STOPDAPT-2 total cohort. CONCLUSIONS: – Clopidogrel monotherapy was superior to aspirin monotherapy for cardiovascular outcomes beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention, without increased bleeding risk. REGISTRATION: – URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02619760 and NCT03462498.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Watanabe, H., Morimoto, T., Natsuaki, M., Yamamoto, K., Obayashi, Y., Nishikawa, R., … Kimura, T. (2026). Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin Monotherapy Beyond 1 Year After PCI: The Final 5-Year Results of the STOPDAPT-2 ACS and STOPDAPT-2 Total Cohort. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.016280

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free