Comparison of different methods for the experimental antenna phase center determination using a planar acquisition system

8Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This work provides the comparison of different methods for the experimental determination of the phase center location of an antenna. The phase center position is determined by means of measured data obtained with a planar scanning system and computed with different methods: a least squares fit method with and without weighting coefficients and a directivity-based plane wave spectrum (PWS) analysis method. A study of the phase center position for different microwave antennas is provided. The results of the different methods are presented and compared, along with the confidence interval of the phase center values due to the uncertainties of the acquisition system.

References Powered by Scopus

Error Analysis Techniques for Planar Near-field Measurements

290Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Basic Theory of Probe-Compensated Near-Field Measurements

261Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An Examination of the Theory and Practices of Planar Near-field Measurement

178Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Fast antenna characterization via a sparse spherical multipole expansion

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Investigation and improvement of the phase-center characteristics of VIVALDI's antenna for UWB applications

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Phase center controlling in Vivaldi antenna: review and development of the story

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Padilla, P., Fernández, J. M., Padilla, J. L., Expósito-Domínguez, G., Sierra-Castañer, M., & Galocha, B. (2013). Comparison of different methods for the experimental antenna phase center determination using a planar acquisition system. Progress in Electromagnetics Research, 135, 331–346. https://doi.org/10.2528/pier12112108

Readers over time

‘14‘16‘18‘19‘20‘21‘2300.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 4

80%

Computer Science 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0