Defining rural in Aotearoa New Zealand: a novel geographic classification for health purposes

  • Nixon G
  • Whitehead J
  • Davie G
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a valid rurality classification for health purposes in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) that is technically robust and incorporates heuristic understandings of rurality. Setting: Our Geographic Classification for Health (GCH) is developed for all of NZ. Participants: We examine the distribution of the entire NZ population across rurality classifications, and use the National Mortality Collection to examine previously masked rural-urban differences in mortality. Outcome measures: Unadjusted all-cause mortality rates and rural:urban incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Results: The GCH modifies key population and drive time thresholds in the generic rurality classifications, thereby identifying 19% of the NZ population as rural. Rural and urban all-cause mortality rates and associated rural:urban IRRs vary considerably depending on rurality classification. The GCH finds a rural mortality rate 21% higher than for urban areas. Conclusions: The GCH identifies a distinct rural population, and highlights rural-urban inequities that are masked by generic classifications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nixon, G., Whitehead, J., Davie, G., de Graaf, B., Crengle, S., Fearnley, D., … Lawrenson, R. (2022). Defining rural in Aotearoa New Zealand: a novel geographic classification for health purposes. New Zealand Medical Journal, 135(1559), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.5495

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free