Clinical factors, diagnostic delay, and residual deficits in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

29Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Management of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is complicated by the challenging diagnosis, monitoring of disease activity, and treatment response. Real world data about the current practice of care in CIDP are rare, but important to improve clinical guidelines. In this study, we determined the current practice of diagnosis and treatment in relation to the clinical outcome of patients with CIDP in a cross-sectional study in The Netherlands. All patients registered at the Dutch neuromuscular patient organization and patients at the Erasmus Medical Center were approached. CIDP diagnosis was confirmed by using patient files and expert consensus. The response rate was 137/197 (70%) and the diagnosis CIDP was confirmed in 112 patients. The time from onset of symptoms until CIDP diagnosis was median 5 months and > 12 months in 26% of the patients. Patients with a late diagnosis (>5 months) compared to patients with an early diagnosis (≤5 months) more frequently had another initial diagnosis (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bunschoten, C., Blomkwist-Markens, P. H., Horemans, A., van Doorn, P. A., & Jacobs, B. C. (2019). Clinical factors, diagnostic delay, and residual deficits in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System, 24(3), 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jns.12344

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free