Sensitivity and reproducibility of ultrasonography in calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition in knee cartilage: A cross-sectional study

26Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective. To compare the ability to detect calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) crystals deposition (CPPD) in knee cartilage by ultrasonography (US) and radiography. Methods. Patients with knee effusion were consecutively included and underwent radiography and US evaluation of knees. Diagnosis of CPPD was made by the identification of CPP crystals. Two blinded rheumatologists performed US assessment. Results. We included 51 patients (25 with CPPD). US revealed hyperechoic spots in all 25 patients with CPPD (sensitivity 100%, specificity 92.3%), whereas radiography revealed CPPD in 16 (sensitivity 64%, specificity 100%; p < 0.0001). Conclusion. US of knees is more sensitive than radiography for CPPD diagnosis.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ottaviani, S., Juge, P. A., Aubrun, A., Palazzo, E., & Dieudé, P. (2015). Sensitivity and reproducibility of ultrasonography in calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition in knee cartilage: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Rheumatology, 42(8), 1511–1513. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.141067

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free