Wired/Classic and Wireless/Periotest "m" instruments: An in vitro assessment of repeatability of stability measurements

6Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This in vitro study evaluated agreement among 10 trained evaluators when assessing implant stability with the Wired/Classic and Wireless/Periotest "M." A difference of 1 Periotest value (PTV) between the wired (-7) and wireless (-8) instruments was observed for the pretest calibration ring. No significant differences were found between the instruments and for all evaluators for all tests (analysis of variance, P < .05). Each instrument can provide meaningful and reproducible recordings of stability measurements.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Crum, P. M., Morris, H. F., Winkler, S., DesRosiers, D., & Yoshino, D. (2014). Wired/Classic and Wireless/Periotest “m” instruments: An in vitro assessment of repeatability of stability measurements. Journal of Oral Implantology, 40(1), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00185

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free