Abstract
This in vitro study evaluated agreement among 10 trained evaluators when assessing implant stability with the Wired/Classic and Wireless/Periotest "M." A difference of 1 Periotest value (PTV) between the wired (-7) and wireless (-8) instruments was observed for the pretest calibration ring. No significant differences were found between the instruments and for all evaluators for all tests (analysis of variance, P < .05). Each instrument can provide meaningful and reproducible recordings of stability measurements.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Crum, P. M., Morris, H. F., Winkler, S., DesRosiers, D., & Yoshino, D. (2014). Wired/Classic and Wireless/Periotest “m” instruments: An in vitro assessment of repeatability of stability measurements. Journal of Oral Implantology, 40(1), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00185
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.