Renewable Portfolio Standards and Policy Stringency: An Assessment of Implementation and Outcomes

18Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This research examines the impact of increasing the stringency of renewable portfolio standards (RPS) on the consumption of energy produced from renewable sources. Putting prior findings in the context of policy learning, first we focus on technological innovation, factor endowments, and economic energy dependence of American states to track how RPS have proliferated and strengthened. Next, we look at the net effect of this RPS evolution on state fossil fuel energy divestment. To evaluate the interplay between: a) the political desire to lower fossil fuel use, b) technological feasibility to do so, and c) the economic trade-offs and risks, we focus on the industrial sector dependence on energy security and affordability. Our results indicate that energy security is a priority and even in light of increasing RPS stringency, states with relatively weak but mandatory RPS are leaders in aggregate renewable energy consumption. This fact is due to favoring biofuel and hydro generation rather than solar and wind because of lower deployment costs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anguelov, N., & Dooley, W. F. (2019). Renewable Portfolio Standards and Policy Stringency: An Assessment of Implementation and Outcomes. Review of Policy Research, 36(2), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12322

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free