Storybook validation: Essential practices for student's financial literacy

  • Irianto O
  • Susanto S
  • Asmaningrum H
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate a financial literacy storybook for Junior High School students using the 4D (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate) method. Research Methodology: This study employs a development research approach, specifically utilizing the 4D (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate) method to create and validate a financial literacy storybook for Junior High School students. Results: The high feasibility scores from both material (72 points) and media (77 points) experts validate the storybook's content accuracy, relevance, and overall design quality. These results suggest that the approach of using digital storytelling, specifically through Storyjumper, can effectively bridge the gap between abstract financial concepts and relatable, age-appropriate narratives for adolescents. Limitations: Firstly, the validation process relies primarily on expert opinions, which, although valuable, may not fully capture the perspectives of the target audience - Junior High School students. The study does not include a pilot test with actual students, which could provide insights into the storybook's real-world effectiveness and engagement levels. Additionally, the research is limited to a specific geographical and cultural context, potentially affecting the generalizability of findings to other regions or educational systems. Contribution: This research contributes a validated financial literacy storybook for Junior High School students, advancing educational tools in this crucial field and demonstrating the 4D method's effectiveness in educational material development.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Irianto, O., Susanto, S., Asmaningrum, H. P., Rachman, A. M., Budiasto, J., & Sokheh, H. (2024). Storybook validation: Essential practices for student’s financial literacy. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic and Practice Studies, 2(4), 451–462. https://doi.org/10.35912/jomaps.v2i4.2466

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free