Microwave ablation versus parathyroidectomy for the treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism: a cohort study

19Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes between microwave ablation (MWA) and parathyroidectomy (PTX) for the treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). Materials and methods: This retrospective study enrolled 212 patients with pHPT treated by either MWA (MWA group) or PTX (PTX group) from January 2015 to October 2020. The baseline data were balanced through propensity score matching. Clinical cure was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between the MWA and PTX groups. The risk factors related to persistent or recurrent pHPT were screening out using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: After propensity score matching, a total of 174 patients were enrolled in the present study, with 87 patients in each group. During the follow-up period (median, 28.5 months), there were no differences between the two groups regarding the clinical cure (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval: 0.81-3.62; p =.155), persistent pHPT rate (13.8% vs. 10.3%, p =.643), recurrent pHPT rate (6.9% vs. 3.4%, p =.496), or major complications (6.9% vs. 3.4%, p =.496). MWA resulted in a shorter procedure time (30 min vs. 60 min), smaller incision length (0.1 cm vs. 7 cm) and slightly higher costs (25745 CNY vs. 24111 CNY) (all p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wei, Y., Zhao, Z. long, Cao, X. jing, Peng, L. li, Li, Y., Wu, J., & Yu, M. an. (2022). Microwave ablation versus parathyroidectomy for the treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism: a cohort study. European Radiology, 32(9), 5821–5830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08759-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free