Comparative efficacy of various interval mass treatment on Ascaris lumbricoides infections in Korea

22Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To observe the effect of various interval mass treatment on Ascaris ova and worm positive rates and worm burden per population, 2-mth, 4-mth, 6-mth and 12-mth interval schemes were designed and applied. All of inhabitants in nine villages of Hwasung Gun, Kyunggi Do, Korea, were treated from April 1977 to May 1980. Each village consisted of 100~140 people; however, there had been 20~40 drop-outs in every treatment. Pyrantel pamoate was used in dose of 10 mg/kg. Evaluation of schemes was made by examinations both for eggs and for expelled worms. The drop-outs in former treatments were included because they were few in number. The results obtained were summarized as follows. The pre-treatment infection status of A. lumbricoides was not significantly different between groups; 32.5-42.2% and 33.8-46.2% in egg and worm positive rates, respectively. The mean worm burdens were in range, 1.6~4.2 per infected and 0.61~1.42 per population. Twelve-mth interval treatment was by no means meaningful to be adopted as a strategy of Ascaris control because egg and worm positive rates and worm burden were returned to pretreatment level. The shorter the treatment interval was, the lower the egg/worm positive rates and worm burden were. By repeating biannual, triannual and six-times-a-year treatments, the indices of prevalence showed the tendency of further lowering during the later 2 years of follow-up. If the mass chemotherapy is adopted as a method of controlling ascariasis in a community, it should be repeated more than two times in a year to expect the gradual lowering of reinfection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Byong-Seol Seo, Seung-Yull Cho, Jong-Yil Chai, & Sung-Tae Hong. (1980). Comparative efficacy of various interval mass treatment on Ascaris lumbricoides infections in Korea. Korean Journal of Parasitology, 18(2), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.1980.18.2.145

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free