Towards Guanxi? Reconciling the “Relational Turn” in Western and Chinese International Relations Scholarship

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In recent years, the “relational turn” in International Relations (IR) theory has attracted extensive attention. However, the limitations of the substantialist ontology of mainstream (Western) IR theory means that it encounters difficulties and dilemmas in interpreting the evolving international system. Against the background of the rapid development of globalization and regional integration, the reality of world politics is constantly changing, and increasingly shows obvious characteristics of interconnection and high interdependence. In this context, there is insufficient research comparing the Western and non-Western versions of the “relational turn”. Relational ontology may be able to provide a bridge between Chinese Confucian philosophy, Western philosophy, Western sociology, and mainstream western IR theories capable of generating productive synergies. However, there are major theoretical and cultural obstacles to be overcome if a reconciliation of the Western and Chinese versions of relationalism is to be achieved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, S., Garlick, J., & Qin, F. (2022). Towards Guanxi? Reconciling the “Relational Turn” in Western and Chinese International Relations Scholarship. All Azimuth, 11(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.952841

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free