A literature review of the evidence that a 12% improvement in FEV1 is an appropriate cut-off for children

15Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: A well-performed spirometry, using a change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) after albuterol, is commonly used to support the likelihood of an asthma diagnosis. The current standard, accepted by the 2007 National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Asthma Expert Panel Report-3 (EPR-3) guidelines, is a 12% improvement in the FEV1 after a bronchodilator. Objective: We sought to determine whether existing studies support or refute using a 12% improvement as a significant change in FEV1 in children and adolescents. Data sources: We reviewed the literature of children and adolescents using Medline searches to discover pertinent population studies and comparative studies that included FEV1 measurements. Result: The majority of the discovered studies suggest a leb stringent improvement in FEV1 in children might be applicable. Conclusion: Supported by the published literature, we suggest an alternative interpretive strategy of exprebing the results of a spirometry measurement when a diagnosis of asthma in a child is being considered using a bronchodilator response.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hopp, R. J., & Pasha, M. A. (2016, April 20). A literature review of the evidence that a 12% improvement in FEV1 is an appropriate cut-off for children. Journal of Asthma. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.3109/02770903.2015.1108436

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free